amaxen

- friends
14,410 link karma
15,837 comment karma
send messageredditor for
what's this?

TROPHY CASE

reddit is a source for what's new and popular online. vote on links that you like or dislike and help decide what's popular, or submit your own!

60 years ago, (Chinese Communist) Huadong Comics published a comic book titled “Great Changes After the Liberation”. Now it's circulating in the Chinese websphere with the tagline 'Not much changes' by amaxenin PropagandaPosters

[–]amaxen[S] 0 points1 point ago

The links are of internet comments by mainland Chinese before the Weibo link was deleted by the government are definitely worth reading - e.g.

The scenes in the comics perfectly match that of the current situation in Mainland China, and its even worse than during the KMT reactionary regime.

...

If the Blue Sky with a White Sun [KMT] Flag is changed to the Five Star[ChiComm] Flag…

Was there ever a period of history that is similar to the romanticized Wild West? by Mattpointgratin AskHistorians

[–]amaxen 3 points4 points ago

The 'warring states' period in Japan is at least in myth somewhat similar to the old west. In fact, many, many Samurai films are remakes of westerns, and even more westerns are remakes of Samurai films set in this period. Examples: The Magnificent Seven is a remake of 'The Seven Samurai', set during this period. Also 'The man with no name'(A Fistful of Dollars (1964), For a Few Dollars More (1965), and The Good, the Bad and the Ugly (1966) Eastwood trilogy is a remake of a similar 'Man with no name.' trilogy of Samurai flicks.

Why is the Philippines so poor? by schueajin AskHistorians

[–]amaxen 0 points1 point ago

Subic bay was the major US base in the Pacific - if you look at the map it's of huge strategic importance. However, in the 80s the Philippine Senate and the US couldn't come to terms over the lease for the base, with the result that the US pulled out.

Why didn't Asians build castles like the Europeans? by flkkin AskHistorians

[–]amaxen 9 points10 points ago

Build straight, tall walls? Those slanted ones look easier to climb. Build tall towers and walls to rain down arrows and oil on your enemies?

They are fairly tall. But the thing about Japan is that it has earthquakes on a pretty regular basis. A lot of the design constraints are how you make both a defensible fortress AND one that is reasonably resistant to earthquake. Another is cultural/economic - Japan, up until fairly recently built most structures (even large structures) of wood.

I would guess that tactical doctrine is different for Japanese vs. European for geographical/demographic reasons - not just earthquakes, but also Japan had a higher population density, meaning you assume you have a lot more men to defend your castle with, etc. Also, here is a start on things.

Edit: also modern incarnations of Japanese castles are only the remnant 'keep', because they tended to be built in areas with pretty high property values. See here for something like what the larger ones originally looked like.

TIL Steve Jobs shut down all philanthropic efforts at Apple when he returned to the company in 1997. by 996hurtin todayilearned

[–]amaxen 0 points1 point ago

How does it 'reduce human value' in China? Chinese manufacuring doesn't get much in terms of total value from the manufacturing of the electronic devices, true. But Apple still brings those jobs there. The vast army of the unemployed would much rather work for them than not work.

Has Civilization Passed the Environmental Point of No Return? by darohitsterin Economics

[–]amaxen -2 points-1 points ago

When your first model fails at its prediction, you keep the prediction and change the model. This is science?

If you were put in charge of trimming Earth's human population down to 3 billion or so, what would your criteria be for who stays and who goes? by Clayburnin AskReddit

[–]amaxen -4 points-3 points ago

Brilliant professors, particularly in the social sciences, don't actually add much value to society in the way that a good ditchdigger does.

Has Civilization Passed the Environmental Point of No Return? by darohitsterin Economics

[–]amaxen -2 points-1 points ago

'The end is nigh'. End actually isn't nigh for this date. 'My bad. NOW the end is nigh'. End isn't actually nigh for revised date either. Rinse and repeat.

How did the American Revolution change how other colonial powers at the time managed their colonies? by Northcuttin AskHistorians

[–]amaxen 0 points1 point ago

More accurately, it was a forerunner of the classical Maoist insurgency - that is, characterized (in 'Phase I' by guerrilla and political agitation, followed by 'Phase II' seizing of sanctuaries and the negotiation of supplies and support by outside powers, followed by 'Phase III' operations - which are full conventional warfare.) It wasn't sniping behind trees that finally won the American Revolution. It was full scale decisive battle at the end of the war, with a lot of help from foreign advisers (the French, some Mercenaries, etc)

Has Civilization Passed the Environmental Point of No Return? by darohitsterin Economics

[–]amaxen 2 points3 points ago

No. That's one of the major problems with the model is that it looks more like something that you'd use to model the behavior of bacteria (a sort of biological model) instead of a more econometric one (i.e. the individual factors you're aggregating have agency)

Has Civilization Passed the Environmental Point of No Return? by darohitsterin Economics

[–]amaxen 1 point2 points ago

So, you think science is: begin with your conclusion. Come up with model that predicts your conclusion. Model then fails. Don't modify your conclusions but come up with a different model that predicts the same pre-determined conclusion. Rinse and repeat ad infinitum?

You have a curious view of the philosophy of science, if so.

Shave your chest, guys. Just once. by hoserammain Fitness

[–]amaxen -7 points-6 points ago

....not even once.

TIL Steve Jobs shut down all philanthropic efforts at Apple when he returned to the company in 1997. by 996hurtin todayilearned

[–]amaxen -1 points0 points ago

Companies help society by creating value. I don't like Steve Jobs, but I don't think you can reproach him for focusing on what Apple is supposed to do instead of trying to be a philanthropic institution.

Has Civilization Passed the Environmental Point of No Return? by darohitsterin Economics

[–]amaxen -5 points-4 points ago

Really? When did they admit their model didn't work? Instead it appears they've added entirely new variables (economic inequality) that don't appear to have much relation to their original model, and claim that they've 'refined' the model in this way. It's still the same linear statistical modeling, which is just about useless when trying to say something about the economy.

'One Nation (under Germany)' - Historian Niall Ferguson predicts the single currency will survive and the crisis will leave Berlin heading a federal Europe by amaxenin europe

[–]amaxen[S] 1 point2 points ago

Under Röhm, the SA also often took the side of workers in strikes and other labour disputes, attacking strikebreakers and supporting picket lines. SA intimidation contributed to the rise of the Nazis, breaking down the electoral activity of the left-wing parties. However, the SA's reputation for street violence and heavy drinking was a hindrance.

.....

By this time, Röhm and Hitler were so close that they addressed each other as du (the German familiar form of "you"). Röhm was the only top Nazi that Hitler addressed as such. In turn, Röhm was the only Nazi who dared address Hitler as "Adolf," rather than "mein Führer."[5]

.....

Röhm and the SA regarded themselves as the vanguard of the "National Socialist revolution." After Hitler's takeover, they expected radical changes in Germany, with power and rewards for them. However, Hitler's use of the SA as storm troopers was a political weapon he no longer needed.

.....

Along with Joseph Goebbels, Gottfried Feder and Walther Darré, Röhm was a prominent member of the party's "socialist" faction. This group took the words "Sozialistische" and "Arbeiter" ("worker") in the party's name literally. They largely rejected capitalism (which they associated with Jews) and pushed for nationalisation of major industrial firms, expanded worker control, confiscation and redistribution of the estates of the old aristocracy and social equality. Röhm spoke of a "second revolution" against "reactionaries" (the National Socialist label for old-line conservatives), as the National Socialists had previously dealt with the Communists and Socialists. All this was threatening to the business community. So Hitler swiftly reassured businessmen that there would be no "second revolution." Many "storm troopers" were of working-class origins and had expected a socialist programme. In fact, it was often said at the time that members of the SA were like a beefsteak — "brown on the outside and red on the inside". They were now disappointed by the new regime's lack of socialist direction and also failure to provide the lavish patronage expected. Röhm even publicly criticized Hitler for his failure to carry through the National Socialist revolution. Furthermore, Röhm and his SA colleagues thought of their force (now over three million strong) as the future army of Germany, replacing the Reichswehr and its professional officers. Although Röhm had been a member of the officer corps, he viewed them as "old fogies" who lacked "revolutionary spirit." In February 1934, Röhm demanded that the Reichswehr (which under the Treaty of Versailles was limited to 100,000 men) be absorbed into the SA under his leadership as Minister of Defence.[6]

.....

However, both the Reichswehr and business conservatives continued their anti-SA complaints to Hindenburg. In early June 1934, defence minister Werner von Blomberg, on Hindenburg's behalf, issued an ultimatum to Hitler: unless political tension ended in Germany, Hindenburg would likely declare martial law and turn over control of the country to the army. Knowing such a step could forever deprive him of power, Hitler decided to carry out his pact with the Reichswehr to suppress the SA. This meant a showdown with Röhm. In Hitler's view, the army and the SA constituted the only real remaining power centres in Germany that were independent in his National Socialist state.

Ernst Röhm

Has Civilization Passed the Environmental Point of No Return? by darohitsterin Economics

[–]amaxen -1 points0 points ago

um, no. Were we to be betting on commodity futures over ten years, that would be quite different than picking a defined period of time to support your own argument. The reality is, statistically, commodity prices fall in the long term. Try The Doomslayer.

Incidentally, it seems they brought Ehrilch on board. Ehrlich: *In the early 1970s, the leading edge of the age of scarcity has arrived,” "Of course there would be mass starvation in the 1970s- or, at least, the 1980s.” Shortages “will become more frequent and more severe”, he wrote. “We are facing, within the next three decades, the disintegration of nation-states infected with growthmania.” *

Has Civilization Passed the Environmental Point of No Return? by darohitsterin Economics

[–]amaxen -2 points-1 points ago

Whereas religion is unfalsifiable dogma. This looks more like the latter.

Has Civilization Passed the Environmental Point of No Return? by darohitsterin Economics

[–]amaxen -1 points0 points ago

Real life data? On a time frame of only 30 years? That apparently hasn't been adjusted for inflation?

Has Civilization Passed the Environmental Point of No Return? by darohitsterin Economics

[–]amaxen 4 points5 points ago

This wasn't really 'science', though. It was a bunch of fixed assumptions about relationships between e.g. economic output and pollution, thrown into a simplistic, linear, static model and then marketed as a 'computer model' to impress the general public.

Has Civilization Passed the Environmental Point of No Return? by darohitsterin Economics

[–]amaxen 1 point2 points ago

There are reasons to believe the era of cheap oil / energy is over, due to a combination of peak oil and the globally connected population growing from 1 billion to 3-4 billions and then some more. Think China + India joining the global economy.

So, instead of the world slipping ever further into poverty.... you're saying instead that we're enriching a significant fraction of mankind, lifting them out of a cycle of starvation and towards first world living standards? Excuse me, but isn't that the complete opposite outcome of what the original club of rome/population bomb studies were predicting? They were saying that we'd all be eating each other while simultaneously drowning in our own sewage while inhaling sulfuric acid by 2012. It's funny that you can't connect the dots - why are we seeing a spike in copper and other commodity pprices in the last decade? Because first world living standards were being extended to previously third world populations - a significant fraction of humanity. Will they stay high? Unlikely.

Has Civilization Passed the Environmental Point of No Return? by darohitsterin Economics

[–]amaxen 9 points10 points ago

These guys failed hard when they first published their model - we were supposed to all be eating each other in the US by no later than 2000. Now, they're not even trying to argue that it's resource depletion - it's just some transient political conditions in the US - 'income inequality' that's going to cause a collapse. These guys are completely discredited. Anyone interested look up the Simon-Ehrlich bet to see some reasons why.

'One Nation (under Germany)' - Historian Niall Ferguson predicts the single currency will survive and the crisis will leave Berlin heading a federal Europe by amaxenin europe

[–]amaxen[S] 1 point2 points ago

Seriously. The US Civil war killed a lot of people to settle little questions like whether the Federal government was stronger than the states or vice versa.

view more: next